401K question. Why do most financial analysts recommend only contributing an amount equal to the company match?
401K question. Why do most financial analysts recommend only contributing an amount equal to the company match?
I contribute quite a bit more than the company match of 6%. Should I reduce it and put that money in another IRA account? which one?
Answers:
crazydave: Everyone's situation is different, but you might be better off reducing the 401k to the company's match and putting the rest in a Roth IRA.
The 401k money is tax-deferred, while the Roth money is not deductible, but the Roth money will be tax-free when you start making distributions, while the 401k money will be taxed.
Speak to your financial advisor to see what is best for you.
2009-10-10 04:41:32
2009-10-10 04:41:32
MG: There are many reasons:
One of the MAIN reasons for contributing to a company's 401 (k) is because if you don't, then you will lose the money your employer is willing to match and give you for free. When an employer matches your contribution, it means free money for you.
However, if an employer doesn't match your contributions or if you are already contributing as much as the amount required to match, then most financial analyst suggest you use other ways to invest your money for your future retirement. Why, you may ask, and the reason are many, I will just list a few:
1) You don't want all of your eggs in one basket. If all or most of your money for retirement is in a 401 (k), then you'd run a higher risk than if you spread it in other types of investment vehicles.
2) 401 (K) plans are limited- you're not free to choose what to buy. So, just like the 2 or 3 health insurance plans your company may offer from 1000 available in the market, your company selection is very limited and may not be the most profitable for you.
3) When you buy 401 (k), your money is also used to buy stocks from your employer- think Enron. So if your company is going to the tank, not only will you be losing your job, but also your retirement money.
4) When you invest with a brokerage company (through a Roth IRA), you may be opening your chances to the wider world of investments- diversifying your investments, and thus your risk.
Even if with a 401 (k) you also have the chance to invest money in tax-free, this isn't still good enough without your employer's matching due to the limited portfolio available and your inability to choose the best for you.
So part of the FA job isn't only to make you money, but also assess your risks as to preserve the money you already have.
Don't keep all of your eggs in one basket.
I hope this helps clarify your question.
2009-10-10 04:43:20
2009-10-10 04:43:20
Chosen Answer
jlf: What they recommend is contributing enough to "max out" the company match because that's free money to you. After that, contributing to a Roth IRA makes the most sense in the long run - because the Roth allows tax-free distribtitions once you reach age 59 1/2.
2009-10-10 05:23:13
jlf: What they recommend is contributing enough to "max out" the company match because that's free money to you. After that, contributing to a Roth IRA makes the most sense in the long run - because the Roth allows tax-free distribtitions once you reach age 59 1/2.
2009-10-10 05:23:13
Susie T: It depends on your tax bracket. If you are married and making jointly more than $78,000/year (25% Federal tax bracket), you need the tax savings from contributing the max to your 401k. If you aren't worried about tax savings, contribute up to the match and do a Roth IRA.
(Although having grown up in Washington, DC, I am not holding my breath that Congress won't someday tax the earnings on Roths, no matter what they say today.)
2009-10-12 09:37:50
2009-10-12 09:37:50